| Tough Land,
Tough Choices… Deciding the Fate of Walker Lake
A map of Nevada is, well,
roomy . . . uncluttered, if you will. Here in Nevada, population
centers are far-flung, major highways are sparse, and rivers and
lakes are few. Precious few. Because, if you could read between
those thin blue lines that represent Nevada’s waterways, you’d
find hard-working folks in hard-to-tame places struggling to eke
a living and a lifestyle out of the limited water resources of this
driest, and fastest-growing, state in the union.
|

Yes, we still have fish .
. . . This billboard beckons anglers headed east on I-80 from
Reno—perhaps toward Pyramid Lake—to consider doing
some fishing at Walker Lake. The lake’s boosters, such
as the Hawthorne Chamber of Commerce and the Mineral County
Economic Development Authority, are working hard to attract
visitors and business to their area, as well as trying to
preserve the lake that is critical to the area’s future.
(Photo by John Doherty) |
It’s the oldest
of Western dilemmas—how to make too little water serve too
many needs—and it has reached a critical point in west central
Nevada’s Walker River Basin. Here, farmers, ranchers, sportsmen,
Native Americans, and environmentalists are clashing over how to
use what little water nature has to offer them. All sides have a
lot at stake—a threatened species, a stable economy, a cultural
heritage, a way of life—and in the end, difficult decisions
will need to be made. Fortunately, DRI’s Dr. John Tracy and
Dr. Saxon Sharpe have some expertise and technology that may help.
Sharpe and Tracy recently
completed an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)of the Walker River
Basin analyzing the effects of a proposal to buy upstream water
rights from willing sellers in order to bring more water to the
teetering ecosystem of Walker Lake, at the river’s end. That
same water could also aid the recovery of the threatened Lahontan
cutthroat trout in the Walker River Basin and help address issues
related to the United States’ water rights claims in the basin.
The proposal is controversial, since more water for Walker Lake
would mean less water for irrigation in agricultural communities
upstream. Without the water, however, the current Walker Lake ecosystem
will collapse, taking with it a large chunk of the economic base
of communities nearer the lake. “This,” says Tracy,
“evokes a lot of passion on both sides.” No surprise
there.
|

Can science save a lake?
Dr. Saxon Sharpe and Dr. John Tracy in front of a 1995 satellite
photo of the Walker Lake watershed with irrigated and riparian
(riverbank) acreage depicted in red. DRI’s GIS/Remote
Sensing Scientist Tim Minor provided satellite imagery and
other spatial data in support of the project. |
During a series of public
meetings and workshops held in communities throughout the area,
Sharpe and Tracy attempted to get to the bottom of those strong
feelings, pinpointing citizens’ most pressing concerns and
using their input to develop potential strategies to help meet those
concerns. “The process has been very much stakeholder-based,”
says Sharpe, “with the issues determined by those involved.”
The findings were then
incorporated into a computer model developed by Tracy to show how
each possible course of action might be likely to play out in the
real world. It’s a tool that will give all sides a chance
to see a little more clearly into their possible futures and, perhaps,
narrow the divide between opposing viewpoints.
The Walker River is divisive
by nature. It’s actually two rivers initially, the East and
West Walker rivers, springing from high elevation headwater streams
in the eastern Sierra Nevada Mountains of California, and combining
to form the main stem of the Walker River just south of Yerington,
Nevada. Along its path, the Walker River system supplies several
reservoirs, the largest being Bridgeport, Weber, and Topaz Lake,
and sustains agriculture in Bridgeport, Antelope, Smith, and Mason
Valleys and on the Walker River Paiute Reservation. Just south of
the reservation, the river ends its journey by flowing into Walker
Lake.
| 
A terminal lake?
Walker Lake is a terminal lake by definition, meaning it has
no outflow. DRI scientists are working with federal, state,
and local agencies and citizens to find a way to insure that
the term doesn’t also describe Walker’s future.
(Copyrighted photo by Scott T. Smith. For information:
email stsphoto@mtwest.net
Website: http://www.agpix.com/stsphoto)
|
Or at least some of it
does. . . in a good year. You see, the Walker River system is over-appropriated,
meaning that even in a year with normal precipitation, where snowpack
levels that feed the stream are at 100 percent, only 84 percent
of the existing agricultural rights can be satisfied. In dry years,
like the past three, even less can be satisfied, resulting not only
in thirsty crops, but also a lake whose waters continually decline
in both volume and quality.
Walker Lake is a remnant
of ancient Lake Lahontan that, 12,000 years ago, covered more than
8,600 square miles of what is known today as the Great Basin. Walker
Lake is five and one-half miles wide, 14 and one-half miles long,
120 feet deep, and disappearing fast. The lake’s level has
dropped about 132 feet since 1908, when extensive agricultural diversions
began, translating to a reduction in lake volume from about 8.6
million acre-feet to about 2.1 million acre-feet. A terminal lake,
meaning it has no outflow, Walker Lake loses more water each year
to evaporation than it receives in inflow, and this increases the
concentration of naturally occurring salts—referred to as
total dissolved solids or TDS. While the waters of Walker Lake have
never been completely fresh, they do support a complex food web
that includes microscopic algae, fish like the tui chub and Lahontan
cutthroat trout, and a host of migratory waterfowl, including common
loons, pelicans, grebes, and ducks. Rising TDS levels are threatening
that system.
“From an ecosystem
standpoint,” says Sharpe, “the lake is coming up on
an ecologic threshold. Prior to 1880, before major irrigation diversions,
TDS levels were something like 2,500 parts per million (ppm). Current
TDS levels in the lake are about 13,000 ppm, and once you reach
about 16,000 you risk killing off the cutthroat trout and chub and
altering the food web.” Without increased flows to the lake,
says Tracy, TDS level in the lake could go up to 35,000 ppm in 60
to 80 years. That is the TDS of seawater. “You’d revert
to an ecosystem something like Mono Lake, with brine shrimp.”
That would spell disaster
for businesses around Walker Lake that depend on summer boaters
and fisherman to succeed—places like Ed’s Bait and Tackle
in Hawthorne, Nevada where anglers stop for grub, gear, and guidance
on their way to pulling nine- and 10-pound trout from the lake.
“So much of the economy of Mineral County depends on tourism
connected to Walker Lake. It’s already struggling and will
only get worse as the lake does,” says Sharpe.
|

Cloud seeding adds to Walker Lake
effort. DRI cloud seeding efforts will involve seven
cloud seeding generators like this one at Willow Flat, about
12 miles west of Bridgeport, California, in the upper Walker
River watershed. Field Technician Jeff Dean services the device
last winter. (Photo by DRI Principal Research Technician
Tom Swafford) |
Analyses indicate that
about 50,000 additional acre-feet of water per year need to reach
Walker Lake in order to keep TDS at levels that will support the
current ecosystem. Much of that water would likely come from the
purchase of water rights upstream, but other strategies might be
used to help reduce the amount of water rights needed. Cloud seeding,
for instance, could increase flows at the head of the river by about
30,000 acre-feet in a normal precipitation year, and some of that
would eventually reach Walker Lake. There’s an inherent limitation
to the effectiveness of cloud seeding, however—you’ve
got to have the right conditions to seed. In wet years, winter storms
provide plenty of these, but the right conditions can be few and
far between in drought years, when the extra precipitation is most
urgently needed. Moving groundwater from stores elsewhere in the
basin and directly into Walker Lake is another possibility, but
this, too, has limitations, among them the high cost of pumping
and transporting water and the distinct possibility that any available
water would also be of poor quality.
In short, enhancement
strategies might help, but they can’t do the whole job. Wherever
the water comes from, says Tracy, it will have strings attached.
“It’s obvious that this water will be good for the ecology
of the stream and lake, but we’ve also got to consider the
economy. This water will change a significant market sector—agriculture.
It’s a difficult trade-off.”
Much of that difficulty
rests on the shoulders of the some 200 farmers of Nevada’s
Smith and Mason Valleys—and farmers in California’s
Bridgeport and Antelope Valleys—upstream from the lake. These
areas are among the richest and most valuable agricultural lands
in the state, producing among other things, onions, garlic, and
high-quality alfalfa. “There is some innovative farming going
on here,” says Tracy. Take for example, Peri and Sons Farms
where they’ve used satellite technology to increase the efficiency
and productivity of their 1,200-acre onion operation—one of
the nation’s largest.
|

He wears several other hats, too.
David Fulstone, a Lyon County Commissioner, trustee of the
DRI Research Foundation, Mason Valley farmer, and longtime
leader for Nevada’s agricultural community, has been
active in bringing interest groups together on the Walker
Lake EIS project. He paused for this photo while irrigating
his fields along the Walker River. (Photo by Bob Duke,
Yerington Photo) |
But, large or small,
none of these farmers take their livelihoods for granted, tied as
they are to such a precious resource. Lyon County Commissioner David
Fulstone II is a member of DRI’s Research Foundation, a leader
in Nevada’s agricultural industry, and a man who calls the
Walker River Basin home. Fulstone’s great-grandmother was
born on the river in 1864, and he and his family have lived on,
worked, and loved this land ever since. “Nevada is the driest
state in the nation, so, of course, water is a huge issue for the
industry, and the whole economy of the valley. If you take out half
of the farmers by taking away their water, you’re also going
to lose those businesses that sell them agricultural equipment,
and so on.” And, he says, it’s not just people that
might suffer. “Irrigated lands support their own flora and
fauna. Pulling the water will put pressure on the upstream environment,
too.”
Those formerly irrigated
fields might have social implications as well, says Tracy, affecting
the aesthetics and character of these bucolic communities. “People
might choose this area for a retirement home because of the green
fields, the rural atmosphere. How are those types of choices going
to be affected if those fields turn back to sagebrush?”
These are the dilemmas,
and the time is approaching for decisions. “It’s clear,”
says Tracy, “that if nothing is done, agriculture is sustainable,
but Walker Lake is not. If we can get more water to it, then Walker
Lake is sustainable into the foreseeable future, and agriculture
would survive as well, although at a decreased level.” Sharpe
agrees that “there are no scenarios where everyone gets everything
they want. People have to ask themselves what sacrifices they’re
willing to make.”
In other words, it comes
down to tough choices. And while Sharpe’s and Tracy’s
work can’t provide an ultimate solution, it can provide reliable
data and realistic alternatives—just the tools that decision-makers
will need to help make those choices. Good information is valuable
stuff, and, just like the water that supports life here in Nevada’s
wide-open spaces, every little bit counts.
–Jackie Allen
|