It's not easy being a Pacific salmon. You get just one shot at
procreation - and then you die. And you can't have your last hurrah just
anywhere. You have to travel back to the exact place you were born - an
upstream journey that can approach 1,000 miles in length and 6,000 feet
in elevation. Along the way, you're easy pickings for the eagles, bears,
and anglers that consider you a singular delicacy. This live of adversity
is what nature and evolution have devised for you. Add to it the stresses
of the human world - dams, commercial fishing, irrigation - and you are,
it would seem, a hapless fish with a tough future.
What the salmon does possess, however, is an integral place in the culture and heritage of the Pacific Northwest. This cultural significance, along with its commercial importance, means that many people, with many divergent interests, are willing to work together to brighten the Pacific salmon's future. From hydropower to hatcheries, all sides agree: the salmon must be saved. The Desert Research Institute's Dr. Kelly Redmond, Regional Climatologist and Deputy Director of the Western Regional Climate Center, is one of those people interested in helping. Along with Dr. Roger Pulwarty of the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado at Boulder, Redmond has completed a study looking at the role of climate and climate-related information in the management and recovery of the salmon population in the Columbia River Basin. The study was published in the March 1997 edition of the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.
|
| Graphic displays of climate conditions simplify complex topics. DRI's climate center collaborates with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to identify significant trends or conditions that affect the ability of salmon to survive the development along the Columbia River. |
And dams are not the only obstacle. Habitat degradation from development as well as stream siltation from logging and grazing reduce the viability of the eggs and young fish. Hatcheries established to increase populations and aid commercial fishing operations have instead had a negative effect on the native stock by increasing competition and introducing disease and less genetically robust fish. And commercial fisheries, as important parts of the region's economy, continue to harvest fish despite the declining numbers.
But as the study points out, we can't accurately judge the harm done by these factors without considering, and attempting to understand, the mechanisms behind the salmon population's natural fluctuations. And a significant reason for those natural fluctuations is climate. "To assess whether mitigating actions are helpful, we really have to know what would have happened if we had done nothing at all," says Redmond. "If we don't incorporate what we know about climate behavior and its effect on the fish, we may end up making less well informed and less effective decisions about management."
Climate is an important backdrop to the Pacific salmon's situation and can affect the fish differently during various stages of its life. Temperature is important, since salmon eggs need cold, clean water in which to hatch. Warm water and heavy sedimentation invite disease. Snow and rainfall rates directly affect another important variable for the salmon - water levels. Low water levels hamper the progress of the salmon swimming upstream and reduce the surface area of river bottoms for egg laying. Slow moving streams also make the trip to the ocean take longer, increasing the danger for young fish. Unusually high, swift-flowing rivers, on the other hand, tend to dislodge eggs before they hatch. As Adults, salmon are also sensitive to changing ocean temperatures and wind-driven currents, which can affect the nutrient density of the waters.
But as Redmond and scientists like him gain a better understanding of how
weather and climate affect the salmon, they are still faced with the
age-old challenge of predicting the weather.
"A good climate forecast is
worth a lot of money in the Pacific Northwest," says Redmond. "Water
managers would love to know what the winter will bring by as early as
August or September, so they could decide how to manage flow and
reservoir levels.
If we can bring then more accurate forecasts, they can
make better decisions." A major part of the
Pulwarty and Redmond study involved finding out how
(or even whether) those who manage the Columbia River system use climate
information and what new roles and applications might be possible with
recent advances in climate forecasting. They found that long -term
forecasting of runoff, river transit times, and stream temperatures were
primary needs in salmon management decisions. But, despite the
significant influence of weather and precipitation rates on the problem,
climate forecasts aren't being used. "In this case, people are almost
universally aware of the importance of climate on the salmon but do not
use available operational climate forecasts to help them make decisions
about their management." Redmond sees this as just another example of a
problem inherent to much scientific work. "There's often a disconnect
between when we as scientists make a discovery and when those who would
benefit from that discovery get the information. To really benefit
society, we need to understand not just our own scientific disciplines
but also how our knowledge can be transferred to those who can use it."
Besides overcoming a reluctance to rely on information that is inherently
uncertain, such as a climate forecast, there is also a need to show
people how to interpret and apply climate information to a particular
problem and to make that climate information more readily available and
usable.
|
|
A tremendous flow of data reflecting the climate conditions of the Columbia River Basin shows up as stacks of documents on Dr. Kelly Redmond's desk in the Western Regional Climate Center in Reno. |
- Jackie Allen